Who was primarily ignored when the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cherokee sovereignty in Worcester v. Georgia?

Who was primarily ignored when the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cherokee sovereignty in Worcester v. Georgia?

• A. Congress
• B. The Georgia state government
• C. The federal government
• D. The Cherokee tribal council

Answer: (B)

The ruling in Worcester v. Georgia in 1832 primarily ignored the Georgia state government. In this landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the sovereignty of the Cherokee Nation and ruled that the state of Georgia did not have the authority to impose laws on Cherokee lands. Chief Justice John Marshall articulated that the federal government had a responsibility to protect the tribes against state encroachments. The Court's decision highlighted the conflict between federal authority and state power, reinforcing the idea that foreign nations, including recognized tribes, possess certain rights against state interference. The Georgia state government had sought to assert its jurisdiction over Cherokee territory, but the Supreme Court's ruling emphasized the autonomy of the Cherokee. This decision had significant implications for the relationship between state and tribal authority and underlined the ongoing struggles over Native American land and sovereignty at the time.

The ruling in Worcester v. Georgia in 1832 primarily ignored the Georgia state government. In this landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the sovereignty of the Cherokee Nation and ruled that the state of Georgia did not have the authority to impose laws on Cherokee lands. Chief Justice John Marshall articulated that the federal government had a responsibility to protect the tribes against state encroachments.

The Court's decision highlighted the conflict between federal authority and state power, reinforcing the idea that foreign nations, including recognized tribes, possess certain rights against state interference. The Georgia state government had sought to assert its jurisdiction over Cherokee territory, but the Supreme Court's ruling emphasized the autonomy of the Cherokee. This decision had significant implications for the relationship between state and tribal authority and underlined the ongoing struggles over Native American land and sovereignty at the time.